Similarly "Guangzhou-Shenzhen West" begins with the k train, hard seat tickets are 24.5 Yuan, while others were 65.5 Yuan. To this end, passengers Zhang Huang last November in Guangzhou Railway (Group) company (hereinafter "Guangzhou Railway Company"), small claims court, require Guangzhou railway company making a public apology, and illegal income of some 178 million yuan in two years returned to the passenger or to charity.
On December 12, Zhang Huang told the surge (www.thepaper.CN), he has received of the Guangzhou Railway transport Court of first book of the civil order, all of his claim was dismissed by the Court, "I could not accept the result and will appeal." Zhang Huang to the surging of the civil award from the news show, first court of Guangzhou Railway transportation believes that Zhang Huang does not have to provide public interest litigation subject qualification and dismissed all claims.
Surging News noted that on November 22 during the hearing, "the availability of public interest litigation subject qualification" is also one of Zhang Huang, Guangzhou railway company the focus of controversy. Zhang Huang said he sued the Guangzhou Railway Company is "public interest litigation" is to "the interests of consumers". But this was refuted Guangzhou Railway Company, Guangzhou Railway Company, said Zhang Huang does not meet the qualification of public interest litigation, litigation cannot represent the interests of other people, which request shall be adjudged invalid.
Two train tickets fares, passengers sued the Guangzhou Railway Company
Surging News earlier reported, on September 7, 2016, K237 Zhang Huang at the Guangzhou Railway station take the train to Shenzhen West station, fare 24.5 Yuan, but that evening at the Shenzhen West railway station K9094 station of Guangzhou, fares are up to 65.5 Yuan. Subsequently, Zhang Huang queries that, "Guangzhou-Shenzhen West" there many times k trains at the beginning, but there are two types of fares, some 24.5 Yuan, 65.5 Yuan.
According to 12306 official website query, currently, "Guangzhou-Shenzhen West" Daily roundtrip respectively has 7 trip k Word beginning train, which three trip train seat (including no seat) fare for 24.5 Yuan, and hard sleeper fare for 70.5 Yuan, and soft fare for 108.5 Yuan (Note: has a trip train exception, its soft fare for 114.5 Yuan); four trip train seat (including no seat) fare for 65.5 Yuan, and hard sleeper fare 143.5 Yuan, and soft fare 218.5 Yuan, both fare does difference larger.
Zhang Huang believes that same route, the same train, a similar service, fares have more than twice times, "is purely an act of illegal fees"; and the ordinary fare for a train ticket up to 65.5 Yuan is obviously unreasonable, guangshen trains, high-speed rail fares only between seventy or eighty. Subsequently, Zhang Huang sued the Guangzhou railway company to ask for a public apology, and illegal income of some 178 million yuan in two years returned to the passenger or to charity.
On November 22, the Guangzhou Railway transport Court of the first trial. During the hearing, Guangzhou Railway companies responded by saying, "the Guangzhou-Shenzhen West" ticket is indeed different, hard seat ticket is 24.5 Yuan, some hard seat ticket is 65.5 Yuan, of which 24.5 travel ticket prices set under the railway, is the base fare; and 65.5 Yuan is in base fares after float on the basis of the fare, is in compliance.
Wide iron company said, "Guangzhou-Shenzhen West" railway line total mileage for 162km, needed after two article railway line, from Guangzhou to Pinghu of 127km belongs to wide nine railway line, benchmark fare is 19.5 Yuan, floating Hou of fare about for for 38.5 Yuan; from Pinghu to Shenzhen West of 35km belongs to South railway line, benchmark fare is 9 Yuan, floating Hou of fare for 27 Yuan, two a interval floating Hou of fare added is 65.5 Yuan.
At this point, head of the propaganda Department of party Committee of Guangzhou railway company said the surging reply of November 22 to 65.5 Yuan after rising fares is by reference to the relevant file fares and prices report, in compliance with. "The Guangzhou-Shenzhen West" section by the Guangzhou Railway Corporation joint venture management of guangshen railway company limited, which is a publicly traded company, have some pricing power. News noted the surging and guangshen railway company limited was also Zhang Huang sued the Guangzhou railway company the additional defendants in the case.
The Court held that passengers do not have public interest litigation subject qualification
Surging Zhang Huang told the press he sued the Guangzhou Railway Company is "public interest litigation", he did not claim individual compensation, "purely for the benefit of consumers."
Surging news notes, November 22 trial, "public interest litigation" is also a focus of dispute. Zhang Huang said he sued the Guangzhou Railway Company is "public interest litigation" is to "the interests of consumers". But this was refuted in Court of Guangzhou Railway Company, Guangzhou Railway Company, said Zhang Huang does not meet the qualification of public interest litigation, litigation cannot represent the interests of other people, which request shall be adjudged invalid.
During the hearing, judge filed a public interest litigation against Zhang Huang have qualifications to comment on the issue.
On December 12, Zhang Huang to the surging of the civil award from the news show, Guangzhou Railway transportation of the Court held that, under article 55th of the civil procedure law of the people's Republic of, for polluting the environment, infringement of legitimate rights and interests of many consumers, damage the public interest, law agencies and related organizations have provided to the court proceedings. Accordingly, the civil lawsuit of public interest litigation has legal, that is, only "law and related organizations" are eligible to provide public interest litigation. More than the network anchors were found false
Above the civil award that, in the present case, Zhang Huang as an individual, there is no legal requirement to bring public interest litigation and related organizations, which provided public interest litigation to the Court in his own name without a legal basis, it dismissed Zhang Huang's prosecution.
Zhang Huang surging news that, for the above finding, he would have expected, but could not accept, would appeal.
No comments:
Post a Comment