Photo: CFP
For PhD during allegations of plagiarism in a paper written by, Yu Yanru was withdrawn at Peking University doctorate. Yu Yanru alma mater to court and demanded the restoration of the legal effect of his doctoral degree. On October 14, the Administrative Chamber of the Court of Haidian District in Beijing public hearing this case.
Yu Yanru journalists told interface, if her doctor's degree has not been revoked, so she could stay in the Academy of social sciences, history of the work. Now, however, hope that even Academy of social sciences postdoctoral work experience, are in "suspense". In addition, the activist also cost her a lot of time and effort.
Yu Yanru in 2008 and admitted to a doctoral candidate at Peking University Department of history, world history, the main France history, and received the doctorate in July 2013.
On July 23, 2013, the papers were published in the international press Yu Yanru 1775 France public journalism "stoning party".
On August 17, 2014, the international press published the notice on Yu Yanru plagiarism, after investigation and verification, found Yu Yanru translation n INA in its papers. R . G elbart papers ("Frondeur" Journalism inthe 1770s) and directly by g elbart reference document as a comment. The magazine also used yellow copy content, finds Yu Yanru behavior "posed a serious plagiarism."
In January 2015, Peking University made the decision on revocation Yu Yanru PhD, found Yu Yanru published academic papers at the school during the 1775 France public journalism "stoning party" has serious plagiarism. According to the People's Republic of China regulations and the academic degrees Committee of the State Council on strengthening the academic degree work ethics and the construction of academic norm views, Peking University graduate students basic academic standards and other regulations, approved by the academic degree Evaluation Committee, decides to revoke Yu Yanru pH recovery degree.
Yu Yanru claims, its non-doctoral thesis plagiarized articles, while the People's Republic of China does not contain any provisions of the regulations authorize colleges and universities, according to the doctoral thesis papers plagiarized and revocation of doctoral degrees.
Yu Yanru also said that in the investigation and processing of Peking University, was not open to her in time-related facts and reasons, violated her right to be informed.
On January 9, 2015, the University academic degree Evaluation Committee met to discuss the investigation results of Yu Yanru. On January 9, the North announced the revocation of his PhD to the media's decision. Worth noting is that North Yu Yanru results without prior notification, but take notice in the media and the world. Future 5 years Beijing will build 12 exciting
In today's hearing, both sides against Yu Yanru plagiarized papers are published in school are hotly contested. Yu Yanru said that when she applied for a doctoral degree, in connection with the paper in the forthcoming State and is not published. On July 23, 2013, the paper was published, she has graduated from school and therefore will not be published in school.
Indeed, in March 2013, had set the Academy of social sciences, Yu Yanru post-doctoral research station, then write email twice in April and June of the international press, published in the second half, signature should be changed by the Peking University Department of history for the Chinese Academy of social sciences, Institute for the history of the world, but did not receive a reply, signature author units still North, that article was published until October of the same year Yu Yanru.
North believes that published papers is a includes the creation, submission, and publication process. Once the author manuscript delivery out, author, behavior that is published has been basically completed. Due to thesis involved writing time, contribute time and time are contained in the plaintiff while at school. Therefore, Yu Yanru table in connection with the paper, belong to academic papers published during the period.
North's agent said in court, Yu Yanru plagiarism in connection with already published more than more than half of the original, has posed serious plagiarism is a serious degree of misconduct. Plagiarism of a serious nature, affecting the poor, "caused a negative impact at home and abroad. "
North agents argue that the North "has the right to revoke degrees decision, well, orderly. "
On April 4, the education law research center of Peking University held the "degree-granting and withdrawal of legal issues in school places" seminar, Peking University School of law Professor Roderick said at the meeting, Yu Yanru does have faults, but he hopes future reconsideration and litigation bodies when conducting the evaluation more carefully, rather than simple. "The cautious respect respect for schools, professional judgment, but also have high respect for individual rights, must not be used by the students ' interests in Exchange for a Halo. "
China University of politics and law professor and Vice President of the China Society of administrative law at the meeting, Liu Xin said, Yu Yanru doctoral thesis and no fraud in this case perjury, degree-granting PhD thesis is the main standard. But North to papers that are posted in school fraud fake as criteria for revocation of his PhD, is not appropriate.
At present, the case is under further investigation.
No comments:
Post a Comment